[ZODB] getOID( object )?
Mike C. Fletcher
mcfletch at geocities.com
Fri Feb 8 17:38:59 EST 2002
I'm doing some refactoring in a little project here, and realising that
I'm maintaining duplicate information for my objects to create unique ID
values. Since ZODB is maintaining the IDs anyway, I'd like to be able
to use those instead.
In particular, I have a lot of objects that need to have unique
identifiers across iterations of the programme (I use these to create
indices which allow for loading only those items which are seen in the
current visualisation). I currently do this by storing an incremented
index in the database root, and manually assign an ID integer to each
new object. This is a really hacky-feeling approach, and I'd like to
eliminate it entirely.
I read in the developer's documentation that I can use _p_oid if the
object has already been stored, but I'm wondering if there's a way to
get the oid _before_ I store the object (since I want to store the index
information at the same time as the object itself).
Alternately, is there a way to force a Persistence.Persistence-based
object to be stored immediately (preferably without requiring that I
commit the whole transaction, as I'm not sure the indexing will work for
all objects, and may need to abort) so that I can rely on there being a
_p_oid available? Could I use a sub-transaction, commit that and then
use the oid? It seems a bit of overkill for something this trivial.
By the way, ZODB is _really_ fun to work with. Automated persistence
machinery makes visualisation programming very slick-feeling (the GUI is
just reflecting the object namespace living in the database).
Secondary question: given an oid from the ZODB, is there a readily
accessible getObject( oid ) method that can go directly to the object?
Not a big problem, I can just use the oid as keys in a PersistentMapping.
Thoughts appreciated,
Mike
_______________________________________
Mike C. Fletcher
http://members.rogers.com/mcfletch/
More information about the Python-list
mailing list