Time to rename Stackless?

[Delaney, Timothy]

> From: Greg Ewing [mailto:greg at cosc.canterbury.ac.nz]
> Christian Tismer <tismer at tismer.com>:
> 
> > It is still stackless in the sense that order of execution is not
> > restricted by the C stack.
> 
> Even so, I still think it's a poor name, because it
> focuses on an implementation detail rather than
> telling you what it can do for you.
> 
> > We have now tasklets, proclets, and the stack slices are
> > stacklets. :)
> 
> Hmmm... maybe it should be called Pythonlet...

Pylet (Pilot).

Tim Delaney