Python vs Java garbage collection?
Erik Max Francis
max at alcyone.com
Mon Dec 23 06:38:28 EST 2002
"Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> It *is* difficult to predict the future. Jython may become irrelevant,
> or Java may grow an extension to invoke finalizers as soon as the
> object
> becomes unreachable.
If Jython becomes irrelevant or Java changes their finalizers and those
changes become widespread such that the Python documentation changes the
unspecified clause to a guarantee of immediate finalization, then I
would change my recommendation.
> I completely understand, and I think you are wrong. You don't need
> further safeguards; the ones you have are sufficient, atleast for some
> (the majority?) of the application.
_If you're using CPython_. If you're not, then they're not. If general
Python -- not just CPython -- portability is a concern, then this in my
opinion is bad advice.
--
Erik Max Francis / max at alcyone.com / http://www.alcyone.com/max/
__ San Jose, CA, USA / 37 20 N 121 53 W / &tSftDotIotE
/ \ The only completely consistent people are the dead.
\__/ Aldous Huxley
Rules for Buh / http://www.alcyone.com/max/projects/cards/buh.html
The official rules to the betting card game, Buh.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list