Creating "virtual" module-namespace

[Harald]

> It's because b is a dictionary.  b['nasenbaer']() would have worked,
> I think, but I don't think it's what you wanted.
No, that is not wat I wanted :-=

> I would do it this way.  I'm assuming "something" is an object (an
> instance of some class) and you want to be able to call
> something.nasenbaer().
Not att all... something can be NO object, because nasenbaer is a class 
and will instanciate it's own objects.

something is rather a module.

I want to use it as if all the class definition is in one file and I do a 
"import nameoffile"

then I have access to all the classes /functions via 
newobjekt=nameoffile.class()

thanks for giving thoughts,

Harald