Numeric slicing, iteration prob.
Fernando Perez
fperez528 at yahoo.com
Mon Aug 5 18:20:01 EDT 2002
Duncan Smith wrote:
> Hello,
> Does anyone know of a cuter way of iterating over an index rather
> than building strings and using eval()? (Example below.) This will get more
> awkward when I need to do further slicing. eg. depending on the results
> returned I might need to generate t[1,:,3], t[:,1,3] etc.
Can't think of a nicer one right now, but there probably is one. Maybe build
the necessary index structures and use take()? Don't know...
> On a related note, does anyone have a feeling for the most efficient way of
> checking if all the values in a returned slice are zero? I can obviously
> just iterate over the cells and break when I get a non-zero value, but I'm
> hoping there's some more efficient method available in Numeric. TIA.
Look into alltrue:
In [14]: import Numeric as N
In [15]: N.alltrue ?
Type: function
Base Class: <type 'function'>
String Form: <function alltrue at 0x82e31f4>
Namespace: Currently not defined in user session.
File:
/usr/users/fperez/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/Numeric/Numeric.py
Definition: N.alltrue(x, axis=0)
Docstring:
Perform a logical_and over the given axis.
That may help.
Cheers,
f
More information about the Python-list
mailing list