Stackless goes Limbo

[Christian Tismer]

Andrew Henshaw wrote:
...

> While you're at it, you might want to look at Occam.  In my opinion, no 
> language handles channels as nicely as Occam.  [Sigh] PAR and ALT would 
> look so nice as Python keywords...

I took Limbo since it seemed to be one of the newest
parallel languages, and it was quite much simpler than
Alef. Sure, I will also take Occam into
account. At the moment, I'm trying to find the simplest
possible but yet most powerful set of primitives,
and I use the other languages to learn from and to lean
on, when I have to find names of functions.

Things like PAR and ALT could in fact convince me
to add new keywords to Stackless Python...

> Good luck!

thanks a lot - chris

-- 
Christian Tismer             :^)   <mailto:tismer at tismer.com>
Mission Impossible 5oftware  :     Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Johannes-Niemeyer-Weg 9a     :    *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14109 Berlin                 :     PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/
work +49 30 89 09 53 34  home +49 30 802 86 56  pager +49 173 24 18 776
PGP 0x57F3BF04       9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619  305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
      whom do you want to sponsor today?   http://www.stackless.com/