In article <3CAC567F.6090407 at mxm.dk>, Max M wrote: >> http://foo/a/b/c + d == http://foo/a/b/d >> http://foo/a/b/c + ../d == http://foo/a/d >> http://foo/a/b/c + ../../d == http://foo/d > > Then what is: > > http://foo/ + d == ? http://foo/d of course. I don't see your point. See RFC 2396 for the rules on relative URL resolution.