explicit is better, BUT... (was Re: PEP 285: Adding a bool type)

[Greg Ewing]

Tim Peters wrote:
> 
> As
> originally posted, they were the "20 Pythonic Theses".  They never need
> revision, because I only gave 19 -- the 20th (or perhaps the first -- they
> weren't numbered) was left open for Guido to fill in.

Perhaps it should be "19 Pythonic theses is sufficient."

-- 
Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, University of Canterbury,	  
Christchurch, New Zealand
To get my email address, please visit my web page:	  
http://www.cosc.canterbury.ac.nz/~greg