In article <3CAC1665.8040209 at mxm.dk>, Max M wrote:
>> relative_url("http://foo/a/b/c", "http://foo/a/d")
>> --> return: "../d"
>
> I hope you mean that the result should be "../../d" ??
No, he means "../d".
http://foo/a/b/c + d == http://foo/a/b/d
http://foo/a/b/c + ../d == http://foo/a/d
http://foo/a/b/c + ../../d == http://foo/d