comparing interpreter speed on two platforms
Chris Barker
chrishbarker at home.net
Wed Oct 3 15:58:51 EDT 2001
"Steven D. Majewski" wrote:
> > a standard PC:
> > 1. PentiumPro 200Mhz (400BogoMips) Debian Linux 2.2 (Kernel 2.2-17) 64M RAM
> >
> > and an embedded system:
> > 2. PowerPC ~60Mhz (68BogoMips) HardHat Linux 2.0 (Kernel 2.4) 16MB RAM
> >Because, as stated in the Linux docs, BogoMips is a meaningless benchmark.
True, but as a rule PPC chips a little faster that Pentiums with the
same clock speed, so I wouldn't expect a 60 Mhz PPC to be 20 times
slower than a 200Mhz Pentium. I have done occasional benchmarks with
Python code, and my 450Mhz Pentium (running Linux) is about the same
speed as my 300Mhz PPC running MacOS 8.6, unless there is a lot of disk
access, in which case the Linux box is much faster.
Of course there are a lot of other factors:
cache: a larger/faster cache could be making a huge difference.
bus speed: memory access time could be very different.
Of course, you have done the right thing: benchmark your actual
application. Now the hard part: find the the bottlenecks, and fixing
them.
-Chris
--
Christopher Barker,
Ph.D.
ChrisHBarker at home.net --- --- ---
http://members.home.net/barkerlohmann ---@@ -----@@ -----@@
------@@@ ------@@@ ------@@@
Oil Spill Modeling ------ @ ------ @ ------ @
Water Resources Engineering ------- --------- --------
Coastal and Fluvial Hydrodynamics --------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Python-list
mailing list