Assignment not the same as defining?

[Mats Wichmann]

On Wed, 3 Oct 2001 22:13:58 -0400, "Tim Peters" <tim.one at home.com>
wrote:

:[Steve Holden]
:> ...
:> The main thing is to remember that assignment is only one of the
:> several (I seem to remember Tim Peters listed five) ways to bind a
:> value to a name.
:
:This isn't really a matter of interpreting goose entrails.  

You're not supposed to open up the geese anyway, they're sacred in a
different way.  For more conventional auguries, use a chicken - or, in
this case, the manual.
Mats Wichmann