A modest indentation proposal
Erann Gat
gat at jpl.nasa.gov
Fri Nov 30 15:05:34 EST 2001
In article <slrna0fill.3bh.delgado at eva17.Mathematik.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>,
delgado at eva17.Mathematik.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Olaf Delgado) wrote:
> Here's another suggestion: legalize a semicolon on a line by
> itself. Thus the code above would look something like this:
>
> biff() # Line 0
> for x in l: # Line 1
> foo() # Line 2
> baz() # Line 3
> ;
> bar() # Line 4
This would be fine with me. (Double-semicolon on a line is another
possibility.) It doesn't matter to me at all what convention is used as
long as it's standardized and not too verbose. It should probably also be
backwards-compatible (and perhaps optional) to help answer some of the
objections that have been raised.
E.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list