iters on ints? (reducing the need for range/xrange)

[Greg Ewing]

Rainer Deyke wrote:
> 
> Seriously, I don't see how this is worse or less Pythonic than, say, 'for
> line in file'.

It makes sense to think of files as containing lines,
but it's stretching things to think of the integer 10
somehow "containing" the integers 0 to 9.

-- 
Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, University of Canterbury,	  
Christchurch, New Zealand
To get my email address, please visit my web page:	  
http://www.cosc.canterbury.ac.nz/~greg