Python execution speed
Chris Barker
chrishbarker at home.net
Wed Nov 21 16:35:18 EST 2001
Peter Hansen wrote:
> The usual approach is simply to profile the
> code and recode the "hot spot" in C.
This is a problem, not a solution! Most of the code I write is in Python
and it is "fast enough", but not all. And while I end up having to write
only little bits in C, those little bits take me a whole lot longer than
a large bits of Python code. Part of the problem for me is that I am not
very fluent in C, but that is the point, you should not have to be
fluent in C to use Python effectively. I also now have to distribute a
compiled library with my code, or presume all my users have compilers.
Given the other options, I still think Python is worth it, but it would
still be a much greater language if you could get it to run as fast as
C! Frankly, if the organization I work for was at all open to it, I'd
give LISP shot: the dynamiscm and the speed...pretty tempting!
BTW, if it wasn't for NumPy, I could only use Python for little scripts,
it would be just too slow for most of what I do (A lot of numerics).
-Chris
--
Christopher Barker,
Ph.D.
ChrisHBarker at home.net --- --- ---
http://members.home.net/barkerlohmann ---@@ -----@@ -----@@
------@@@ ------@@@ ------@@@
Oil Spill Modeling ------ @ ------ @ ------ @
Water Resources Engineering ------- --------- --------
Coastal and Fluvial Hydrodynamics --------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Python-list
mailing list