PEP 276 Simple Iterator for ints (fwd)

[James_Althoff at i2.com]

David Eppstein wrote:
>If the goal is to make it easy to avoid range() in for loops, I'd prefer
to
>see it done in a way that makes sense semantically and not just because
>it's a short previously-unused syntax.  Hence my continued contribution to

>the discussion of alternatives.

Nothing wrong with new ideas!  Keep those suggestions coming.  :-)

Jim