iters on ints? (reducing the need for range/xrange)

Carsten Gaebler clpy at snakefarm.org
Fri Nov 9 07:39:11 EST 2001


Paul Rubin wrote:

> Really the ellipsis should make an iterator: for i in 0...10.

Sounds pretty cool. However, the ellipsis seems to be poorly
documented.

cg.
-- 
'In iteger arithetric divsion is no the oposite of multiplication.'



More information about the Python-list mailing list