I really like Python but ....

[Bill Walker]

Continuing with your example...

I love the car. It is the best thing I've ever driven. Now, I would like to
loan it to a friend to use. I then find out it wont run unless he has his
own engine!



"dsavitsk" <dsavitsk at e-coli.net> wrote in message
news:cbaQ6.14139$ce.9597133 at newsrump.sjc.telocity.net...
> if nissan were about to give you a free new car, one that was (with the
> exception that if anyone else wanted to use the stereo they would have to
> install their own version of it) the best designed car you had ever tried,
> would you:
>
> a) accept the car graciously and see how you liked it,
> b) accept the car graciously and fix the stereo problem yourself,
> c) refuse the car until nissan agreed to replace the stereos in all of
their
> cars?
>
> -d
>
>
> "Bill Walker" <bwalker at earth1.net> wrote in message
> news:th23t4g7qnet49 at corp.supernews.com...
> > It's absolutely the most thought-out and easy to program language that I
> > have tried (starting with Fortran in the 70's up to Java recently);
> HOWEVER,
> > I
> > can't get too excited about it until a true compiler for Python comes
> along.
> > I'll accept even a decent byte-code compiler that locks up all the
> modules,
> > dlls, etc, into one exe. No, py2exe doesn't work well; especially with
> > tkinter -- leaves out modules.
> >
> > Without this capability it is just too hard to distribute code to any
but
> > those that already have Python installed (which are usually other
> > programmers.)
> >
> > Somebody work on this, please...
> >
> >
>
>