python suitability for large critical run forever apps
Tim Rowe
digitig at cix.co.uk
Wed Mar 21 17:02:00 EST 2001
In article <3AB77CE4.78378862 at troikanetworks.com>,
bedge at troikanetworks.com (Bruce Edge) wrote:
> I started using Python for come user CLI stuff. It has worked out so
> well that we're thinking about extending it's use in our project.
> I am not experienced enough to be able to answer some of the issues that
> came up. Does anyone have any thoughts on these:
<snip>
It depends on what you mean by "large critical run forever apps". I
routinely deal with systems that can kill a few hundred people if they go
wrong, and that's what /I/ mean by "critical". But then I baulk at the
suggestion that such a system might be "large", never mind the suggestion
that it might be multithreaded! If you need something like IEC61508 SIL4
or the military equivalents then forget Python (and C/C++, and Perl, and
Ruby...). That doesn't make /any/ of those a "toy" language, just not
right for that application. I've said before -- here, I think -- that I
don't believe in general purpose languages; to misquote Michael Jackson,
if a language offers to helps you with /every/ problem, it won't help you
/much/ with /any/ problem.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list