Is setup.py a "good thing"? (long)
Mike Romberg
romberg at smaug.fsl.noaa.gov
Thu Mar 22 17:47:00 EST 2001
>>>>> " " == Mike Clarkson <support> writes:
> setup.py was introduced in 2.1, presumably to help configure
> and compile Python, so presumably it's a "good thing". But I
> have an uneasy feeling which I will try to explain.
[snip]
I too have these same concerns about setup.py. To me it seems that
distutils (which is what I think setup.py uses) does not yet work very
well with C extension modules. So, why not use configure to deal with
these and let distutils do the pure python stuff. I suppose distutils
could even call configure. A setup like this would allow users to
specify Tcl/Tk and other libraries using one of the methods supported
by configure. As of now I'm not real comfortable with having to hack
setup.py to get _tkinter to build. I can do this but describing what
needs to be done to others is difficult. It is more complicated that
a makefile or a simple command line argument to configure.
Mike Romberg (romberg at fsl.noaa.gov)
More information about the Python-list
mailing list