A counter-proposal to __future__ in PEP 236

Tim Peters tim.one at home.com
Thu Mar 1 15:48:21 EST 2001


[Joshua Marshall]
> ...
> Note that it doesn't need to be implemented this way.  Currently,
>
>   directive foo
>
> is a syntax error.  Meaning can be assigned to this syntax without
> breaking any existing code--it is unambiguous.

You should study Python's parser before getting too optimistic about that
<wink>.





More information about the Python-list mailing list