Python 2 times slower than Perl
Roman Suzi
rnd at onego.ru
Wed Jul 18 04:07:37 EDT 2001
On 18 Jul 2001, Xu, C.S. wrote:
> Thanks for all comments. Now I revised my stupid testing
> python script to adopt both a func (save original 38 seconds
> to 28 seconds) and a for loop (save original 38 seconds to
> 21 seconds), I got 16.0 seconds, which is pretty comparable
> to perl's 15.4 seconds.
>
> The revised stupid testing py is:
>
> #!/usr/bin/env python
> def f():
> for i in xrange(2.5, 1e7, 1.):
> j = 2.5 * 2.5
> print i, j
> f()
>
>
> Interesting is for perl: On the same PII 450 MHz, "for" loop
> in stead of "while" loop increase about 10% speed, but on another
> PIII 1GHz, "for" slowes down speed by 30% (from 8 seconds of
> "while" to 10.6 seconds of "for"). Only computers themselves
> can understand, :-(
>>> def f():
... for i in xrange(2.5, 1e7, 1.):
... j = 2.5 * 2.5
... print i, j
...
>>> f()
9999999 6.25
>>> import profile
>>> profile.run("f()")
9999999 6.25
3 function calls in 11.680 CPU seconds
Ordered by: standard name
ncalls tottime percall cumtime percall filename:lineno(function)
1 11.630 11.630 11.630 11.630 <stdin>:1(f)
1 0.000 0.000 11.630 11.630 <string>:1(?)
1 0.050 0.050 11.680 11.680 profile:0(f())
0 0.000 0.000 profile:0(profiler)
How do you measure?
Sincerely yours, Roman A.Suzi
--
- Petrozavodsk - Karelia - Russia - mailto:rnd at onego.ru -
More information about the Python-list
mailing list