PEP: Procedure for Adding New Modules (please comment)

[Martijn Faassen]

Hernan M. Foffani <hfoffani at yahoo.com> wrote:
> m.faassen at vet.uu.nl (Martijn Faassen) wrote:
>>    A related question is integration with the Python documentation
>>    process. Contributions should come with good documentation that
>>    can be integrated with the Standard Library documentation. Should
>>    we detail this more in this PEP?

> No, unless this PEP is merged with Carlos' one.
> Definitely, it's one of Carlos' PEP issue.
> What you should add to this PEP is a reference that the chance of a
> contribution to be accepted is directly proportional to the cumpliment of
> the Quality Guidelines.

Agreed; Carlos and I have been in communication about this after I wrote
this. I should've changed this section before publicizing it here.

Either Carlos and I will merge the PEPs or we'll propose two complementary
PEPs.

Regards,

Martijn
-- 
History of the 20th Century: WW1, WW2, WW3?
No, WWW -- Could we be going in the right direction?