a break for comprehensions

[Peter Hansen]

Steve Holden wrote:
> 
> I believe a separate syntax would be required to represent such a radically
> different object. But you, of course, may know better ... if you're looking
> for a syntax, one possibility would be:
> 
>     [[x * 2 for x in g()]]

If that doesn't refer to a list comprehension formed inside another list,
you'd be well on your way to reinventing another language whose name begins
with P...

-- 
----------------------
Peter Hansen, P.Eng.
peter at engcorp.com