Is this a true statement: Part III

[Courageous]

>The thing that I found interesting about the Part II posts were the positive
>things said about the C language.  Is C that much different than C++?  Why
>the leaning towards C over C++?

The explosion of forms available and commonly in use in C++ gives me
a headache. I really just want "C with classes and virtual functions," pretty
much. Templates are an abortion. The reference operator is often used
in lieu of a perfectly good pointer, and when it is, it's badly obfuscating.

C//