PEP0238 lament
Erik Max Francis
max at alcyone.com
Wed Jul 25 12:37:47 EDT 2001
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> As long as the -D option can change the defaults, all library code
> needs to keep the __future__ division statement.
In this case (where Python language changes start happening to the point
where a program has to declare the language features it plans to use),
wouldn't a syntax such as
directive float_division
make more sense? I think the __future__ syntax is quite acceptable for
short-term hacks (i.e., you want to use a feature that's being
introduced but is not the default yet), but if such changes become
commonplace it seems that a more fundamental notation might be
preferable.
--
Erik Max Francis / max at alcyone.com / http://www.alcyone.com/max/
__ San Jose, CA, US / 37 20 N 121 53 W / ICQ16063900 / &tSftDotIotE
/ \ Why don't you grow up for crying out loud?
\__/ Capt. Benjamin "Hawkeye" Pierce
Computer science / http://www.alcyone.com/max/reference/compsci/
A computer science reference.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list