Generator Comprehensions? was Re: a break for comprehensions

[Michael Chermside]

> > I believe a separate syntax would be required to represent such a
> radically
> > different object. But you, of course, may know better ... if you're
> looking
> > for a syntax, one possibility would be:
> >
> > [[x * 2 for x in g()]]
> >
> > regards
> > Steve
> 
> That particular syntax won't do since 
      [..snip..]
> 
> How about [... x * 2 for x in g()]
> 

How about this:

def f():
    for x in g():
        yield x * 2

Of course it gives a generator, not a list... but that
seems to be a reasonable form to represent an infinite sequence.

-- Michael Chermside