Long Live Python!
Peter Hansen
peter at engcorp.com
Fri Jul 13 21:27:04 EDT 2001
James_Althoff at i2.com wrote:
> ... if someone says "good for short
> programs <100 lines" -- mentioning a specific number ("100" in this case)
> -- wouldn't common sense dictate that the intention was also to indicate
> something like "Python is something *different than good* for programs
> >=100 lines (or let's say *significantly* greater than 100 lines -- to be
> reasonable and fair)?
I can't really argue with that. I understand how you interpreted
the comment, but I didn't see it the same way, and apparently
it wasn't intended that way either. No big deal.
> Otherwise, I would think it much simpler and less ambiguous just to say
> "Python is good for programs small, medium, and large -- which is, in
> fact, my view! :-)
And mine, and (apparently) Phil's too! We're close to deafening
each other with our agreement on this issue! <grin>
(Okay, actually I would disagree with the word "good".
Clearly Python is "excellent" for medium programs and
"stellar" for large programs. Case closed. ;-)
--
----------------------
Peter Hansen, P.Eng.
peter at engcorp.com
More information about the Python-list
mailing list