Long Live Python!

[James_Althoff at i2.com]

Philip Hunt wrote:
>On Fri, 13 Jul 2001 12:29:32 -0700, James_Althoff at i2.com
<James_Althoff at i2.com> wrote:
>>
>>Granted, I used "only".  On the other hand, if someone says "good for
short
>>programs <100 lines" -- mentioning a specific number ("100" in this case)
>>-- wouldn't common sense dictate that the intention was also to indicate
>>something like "Python is something *different than good* for programs
>> >=100 lines (or let's say *significantly* greater than 100 lines -- to
be
>>reasonable and fair)?
>
>No it would not. If I say "my car is convenient for journeys <10 miles",
>it doesn't mean it is inconvenient for journeys >10 miles, does it?

How about if we just forward this over to the Department of Arguments?  (I
think it's right next to the Office of Silliness).

Jim