defining classes within loops?

[David Bolen]

Roy Smith <roy at panix.com> writes:

> The documentation for the "continue" statement says:
> 
> > continue may only occur syntactically nested in a for or while loop,
> > but not nested in a function or class definition
> 
> Just out of curiosity, how many people have ever written a function or 
> class definition nested inside a loop?  Seems like sort of a strange thing 
> to do, although I suppose it might be useful in some situations.

I personally haven't, but the function definition method would
certainly fit in with some of the threads about using a named function
close to invocation instead of lambda.

--
-- David
-- 
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------\
 \               David Bolen            \   E-mail: db3l at fitlinxx.com  /
  |             FitLinxx, Inc.            \  Phone: (203) 708-5192    |
 /  860 Canal Street, Stamford, CT  06902   \  Fax: (203) 316-5150     \
\-----------------------------------------------------------------------/