SSL EOF

[Darren New]

Clarence Gardner wrote:
> Here is the relevant code.  I don't know what error==6 signifies, but even
> if the other side closed improperly, I don't think that's so significant as to
> warrant making these sockets behave differently from non-ssl ones.

Well, that's the "read" side. I meant if the "write" side was (say) dumping
core rather than calling SSL_close(). I suppose (*if* this is the problem)
that the authors of the SSL library felt it was important to know if someone
tried to interfere with the communications, which might result in such an
error.

-- 
Darren New / Senior MTS & Free Radical / Invisible Worlds Inc.
San Diego, CA, USA (PST).  Cryptokeys on demand.
"It says this wine has syphilis."
               "I think that's pronounced `sulphates'."