PSU uses emacs?
Grant Edwards
grante at visi.com
Fri Jan 26 17:09:54 EST 2001
In article <mailman.980546199.11562.python-list at python.org>, Jürgen A. Erhard wrote:
> >>> [...] Who designed DOS anyway, Gary Kildall wasn't it?
>
> >> That was CP/M, the 16-bit version of which was considered by
> >> IBM for their PC but not chosen. MS-DOS was first licensed and
> >> then purchased by Microsoft from Seattle Computer Products. It
> >> was written by Tim Paterson; heavy CP/M influence is evident,
> >> but it was far from a clone. See Paul Ceruzzi, /A History of
> >> Modern Computing/.
>
> Grant> Looked like a clone to me. Virtually identical FCB
> Grant> structure, BIOS entry point at 0x0005, same executable
> Grant> layout, etc. etc.
>
>What I recall from the time is that (I heard then) there was a tool
>(from Intel?) that could convert 8080 assembly code to 8086/88
>assembly code.
I remember reading about that translator in Intel literature
when the 8086 was introduced. I never met anybody who used it.
>So with a virtually identical OS (in the important things as you,
>Grant, mentioned), application vendors could *very* easily port their
>CP/M software to QDOS (recall that *then*, and especially on CP/M,
>virtually all software was still being written in assembly).
I'm not sure how many apps were "mechanically" ported from CP/M
to DOS. I vaguely recall reading that they usually ended up
being rewritten by hand. As a result of Intel's desire to be
backwards compatible with the 8080, we've been saddled with the
brain-dead 8086 architecture ever since.
>PS: Does this all mean that I'm *OLD*? ;-)
Yup -- at least in the computer world.
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! I didn't order
at any WOO-WOO... Maybe a
visi.com YUBBA... But no WOO-WOO!
More information about the Python-list
mailing list