XML Schema?

[Harry George]

My concern was not about parsers per se, but a general body of work
rapidly developing and moving to either legal or defacto standard
status.  If that work is focused on one or a few languages, then other
languages have some difficulty staying in the game.  

So I'm looking for a low cost way to keep up.  One way is to bind to
libraries generated by others -- that's easier done against C/C++
libraries.  Another is to do idiomatic code conversion -- that's
probably easier done from Java to Python.

Martin von Loewis <loewis at informatik.hu-berlin.de> writes:

> Harry George <hgg9140 at cola.ca.boeing.com> writes:
> 
> > > It's also open for debate what you'd gain from using that XML parser,
> > > compared to, say, Expat.
> > > 
> > 
> > Expat has XML Schema and UDDI?
> 
> As Paul points out: Xerces C++ does not have schema support,
> either. Not sure how UDDI fits into the parsing business, though.
> 
> Regards,
> Martin

-- 
Harry George                E-mail:  harry.g.george at boeing.com
The Boeing Company          Renton:  (425) 237-6915
P. O. Box 3707  02-CA       Everett: (425) 266-3868
Seattle, WA 98124-2207      Page:    (425) 631-8803