Best solution (Re: Discussion about PEP 234: iterators)

[Paul Moore]

On Tue, 20 Feb 2001 08:57:34 +0100, Steve Purcell
<stephen_purcell at yahoo.com> wrote:

>Huaiyu Zhu wrote:
[...]
>
>I love it. Where do I vote? :-)

You need to copy the proposal to the PEP author, Ka-Ping Yee
<ping at lfw.org>. He may be reading here, but best to be certain.

BTW, I like the look of this, too, but I suspect that there may be
subtleties which need addressing. The full PEP had a lot of issues
around ensuring backwards compatibility, dealing with user-defined
types and the like, which I don't follow well enough to comment
myself.

Paul.