a comment about PEPs

[phil hunt]

On Mon, 3 Dec 2001 11:15:44 GMT, Michael Hudson <mwh at python.net> wrote:
>philh at comuno.freeserve.co.uk (phil hunt) writes:
>
>> Whenever I have a peek at c.l.p, there are usually several threads going
>> suggesting improvements to the langauge.
>> 
>> Why is this?
>
>Because threads that start with "Python's fantastic!!" don't usually
>garner many followups?  Same sort of thing as "no news is good news".
>
>The advantage of PEPs is if someone writes one and it gets rejected
>there's a chance (and only a chance) of heading off the discussion the
>next time around.

Who decides whether PEPs are approved/rejected? The BDFL?

-- 
*** Philip Hunt *** philh at comuno.freeserve.co.uk ***