COM Registration Attributes

[Bill Bell]

"Alex Martelli" <aleax at aleax.it> wrote, in part:
> "Bill Bell" <bill-bell at bill-bell.hamilton.on.ca> wrote in message
> news:5edaf477.0112280645.246f7229 at posting.google.com... > I have been
> wondering again about the best way of handling a > collection of
> Windows registry key additions, deletions or changes as > part of
> registering a Python COM server.
>     ...
> > 4. Wrap atl.dll and make it part of the standard Windows
> > distribution.
>     ...
> > changes the specs for .rgs scripts. (Mind you, isn't this stuff
> > meant to become less of an issue?) Option 4 looks nicest to me.
> 
> Maybe not to Microsoft's legal department, though.  It would be at
> least wise to check with them rather than assuming they'd be glad to
> see some of their "redistributables" redistributed this way (i.e., as
> a part of a development environment).

You're right: maybe they wouldn't. :o)

I should perhaps have suggested (something like) distributing a 
wrapper, rather than the thingy being wrapped.

Thanks for comment.
"It is the time that you have wasted for your rose that makes your rose so important."--St-Exupery