(in)exactness of complex numbers

[Bengt Richter]

On Wed, 1 Aug 2001 20:06:06 -0400, "Tim Peters" <tim.one at home.com> wrote:

>[Bengt Richter]
>> ... internals people (of which I'm
>> not one, in case the thought occurred. Not that I wouldn't like to be at
>> some point ;-).
>
>Jump in!  Love to have you.  Try to do something useful, though <wink>.
>
Thanks. I'm all shook up ;-)
I've got a ways to go before I truly grok the implementation though,
and a few other things are pressing, so I can't promise anything
serious for some time, I fear ;-(