Stackless Python and Python 2.x

[Tim Peters]

[Michael Abbott, quoting himself]
> What's the current status of Stackless Python in relation to the
> developing Python 2.x implementation?

[and then replying]
> An eloquent silence.

See

    http://www.stackless.com/

for the only news there is.

> Alas.  I thought that building in continuations was a cute idea.  
> However, I've seen Guido van Rossum quoted as being against this
> because it's incompatible with the Java Virtual Machine (as I
> understood it).

It's complicated, and "cute" isn't enough.

except-for-me<wink>-ly y'rs  - tim