Bug in __imul__

[Roman Suzi]

Hello!

On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, Mikael Olofsson wrote:   <---
>On 13-Jul-2001 Piet van Oostrum wrote:       <---

Where from this ancient letter appeared?
I think, it's a bug in someone's software.

> > >>>>> Roman Suzi <rnd at onego.ru> (RS) writes:
> >
> >  RS> There is a joke about americans:
> >
> >  RS> they were confused that Excel give different result from
> >  RS> pocket calculator:
> >
> >  RS> [5] [+] [3] [*] [4] [=]
> >
> >  RS> | 32 |
> >
> >  My pocketcalculator gives 17. But then it's a Dutch one (Philips).
>
>In my experience, you can divide pocket calculators into two types based
>on wheather they have a button labelled '%' or not. Those that do have
>that button return 32, and those who do not have that button return 17.
>And that's regardless of the brand.
>
>It's up to you to decide from which bag you want to pick your pocket
>calculator.
>
>/Mikael

Sincerely yours, Roman Suzi
-- 
_/ Russia _/ Karelia _/ Petrozavodsk _/ rnd at onego.ru _/
_/ Monday, August 13, 2001 _/ Powered by Linux RedHat 6.2 _/
_/ "I distinctly remember forgetting that." _/