2.2 features

[Greg Ewing]

William Tanksley wrote:
> 
> If you insist.  I think "x in type" is cleaner than isinstance(x,type).
> The main problem with the second one is that it requires memory of the
> order of the arguments, as well as the name of the syntax.

How about

   x in class c

for isinstance, and

   class c1 in class c2

for issubclass?

-- 
Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, University of Canterbury,	  
Christchurch, New Zealand
To get my email address, please visit my web page:	  
http://www.cosc.canterbury.ac.nz/~greg