Python 2.1 performance

[Per Gummedal]

20.04.2001, 12:13, Michael Hudson wrote:

> mal's pybench makes the CVS of about 3 months back about 3% slower
> than Python 2.0; I *doubt* the released version was much different
> (but as I said in a post yesterday - this is a hunch about
> performance, and therefore probably wrong).

> Can you try building using the optional memory allocator?  I don't
> know how you do that on Windows, but it would be interesting.


I don't have a compiler on Windows.
I tried it once on python2.0 for AS/400 without noticeable effect.

--
Per