Mapping Python to CORBA
Duncan Grisby
dgrisby at uk.research.att.com
Fri Sep 22 05:44:51 EDT 2000
In article <m4i66nps5bo.fsf at macquarie.com.au>,
Timothy Docker <timd at macquarie.com.au> wrote:
>However, having said this, I think there is a reverse mapping for
>(some parts of?) java, and there is also one for COM in the
>COM<->CORBA interoperability specification.
There is indeed a Java -> IDL mapping, and that's where all the
valuetype ugliness in CORBA 2.3 comes from. It only really exists to
allow RMI over IIOP -- I don't imagine anyone is using it to
communicate from Java to some other language. COM is a different
proposition, since it already restricts the sorts of things which can
be transmitted.
Java -> IDL relies on the fact that Java is statically typed, so a
pre-compiler can figure out the mapping to IDL. For Python, you'd have
to do it at run-time, so it would be much less useful. Why not just
use pickle, and send the data as a CORBA sequence<octet>?
Cheers,
Duncan.
--
-- Duncan Grisby \ Research Engineer --
-- AT&T Laboratories Cambridge --
-- http://www.uk.research.att.com/~dpg1 --
More information about the Python-list
mailing list