No Python 2.0 (was Re: idiom for initial list of lists)

[Aahz Maruch]

In article <wkem2uixcq.fsf at turangalila.harmonixmusic.com>,
Dan Schmidt  <dfan at harmonixmusic.com> wrote:
>
>Or in Python 2.0,
>
>  S = [[] for x in range(5)]

I'm calling once again for everyone to please refrain from giving Python
2.0 answers to questions unless the questioner specifically mentions
Python 2.0.  IMO, it unnecessarily complicates things, because most
people asking questions need to use a shipping version of Python.
-- 
                      --- Aahz (Copyright 2000 by aahz at pobox.com)

Androgynous poly kinky vanilla queer het    <*>     http://www.rahul.net/aahz/
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6

Usenet is not a democracy.  It is a weird cross between an anarchy 
and a dictatorship.  --Aahz