continue statement: best way round a problem

[Steve Holden]

Greg Ewing wrote:
> 
> Skip Montanaro wrote:
> >
> > Clearly, the second continue
> > statement is in a valid place.  It's inside the for loop and not executed
> > from a try clause.
> 
> But both of those continues are inside the *outer* try,
> so *neither* of them should be valid!
> 
Well, since it accepts one and not the other, whether they are both
valid or both invalid there's clearly something wrong.  Can someone
who's tracking the 2.0 beta releases let us know whether the continue
anomaly is FINR?

regards
 Steve
-- 
Helping people meet their information needs with training and technology.
703 967 0887      sholden at bellatlantic.net      http://www.holdenweb.com/