*blink* That's neat.

[David Broadwell (remove spam.)]

> Hmmm...my years around these beasts (starting in the 1950s) 
> suggest that *any* time I use "not" with "and" or "or" (or other
> spellings of not, and, or), I had better slow down and make very 
> sure that I'm writing what I mean.  So much debug time is thus 
> saved.

Guess the 'digital' logic training shows, but if i suspect one of 
those things, i can always whip up the truth tables..