deque vs list: performance notes

[David C. Ullrich]

Michael Hudson <mwh21 at cam.ac.uk> wrote in article
<m3og5myepf.fsf at atrus.jesus.cam.ac.uk>...
> david_ullrich at my-deja.com writes:
> 
> >      You sure about that "n!"? Seems more like n^2 to me.
> > (Of course n^2 is big, but n! would be much worse. It's
> > a theorem that n! is bigger than anything.)
> 
> n^n is worse than n!, if you're after really bad algorithmic
> performance.

	Thanks, and btw remind me to find the <g> key on that new
keyboard at the office.

	I once had some kids in "discrete II" who actually _did_ 
think n! was bigger than anything, believe it or not. (Seriously,
n! is worse than anything that's gonna happen with a couple
nested loops...)

DU

> Cheers,
> Michael
> 
> -- 
>   Programming languages should be designed not by piling feature on
>   top of  feature, but by removing the  weaknesses and restrictions
>   that make the additional features appear necessary.
>                -- Revised(5) Report on the Algorithmic Language Scheme
>