python improvements (Was: Re: New Language)
Martijn Faassen
m.faassen at vet.uu.nl
Mon May 15 16:40:37 EDT 2000
Russell E. Owen <owen at astronojnk.washington.edu.invalid> wrote:
[snip]
> - class methods (e.g. ClassName.doSomething(...)). Often useful where
> global functions might otherwise be wanted. By requiring the class name
> one gets namespace protection and categorizes the function as relevant
> to objects of the given class.
Hm, how would this provide you with more namespace protection than the
current module system? By being in the same module, a function also
gets categorized as relevant to objects of the classes defined in the
module, too..
> - class methods don't need "self" as the first argument; it's a keyword
> that is autmomatically defined. Less confusing because the caller's
> argument list matches the receiver's argument list. Also, by forcing a
> keyword ("self") to be used, improves code uniformity.
Hm, but this would destroy the nice smooth transition from records to
objects in Python:
class Record:
pass
def method(self):
self.foo = 1
class Class:
def method(self):
self.foo = 1
Regards,
Martijn
--
History of the 20th Century: WW1, WW2, WW3?
No, WWW -- Could we be going in the right direction?
More information about the Python-list
mailing list