Is it just Syntactic Sugar ?

[Cliff Crawford]

* Eric Hagemann <ehagemann at home.com> menulis:
| At the risk of pushing on what seems to be a good idea let's not forget
| the 'other "and becomes" operators as well (*=,/=,>>=,<<=...... etc)

These don't really make sense for non-numeric classes.  For example,
what would *= used on lists do?  You could say that l *= n is equivalent
to l = l * n, but is that really useful?  I've never seen or used such a
construct before.


-- 
cliff crawford    -><-    http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/cjc26/
                          Synaesthesia now!            icq 68165166