Python performance

Makhno mak at imakhno.freeserve.co.uk
Thu Mar 9 08:32:36 EST 2000


>Pick an application. Any application (almost). I bet you that
>at least 80% of it is "non-critical, low-performance". So
>write the performance-critical bits in C or, if you really
>need to, assembler, and the rest in a higher-level language.

I aggree entirely. The idea of writing the core system in a low-level
language, and having a higher-level language as it's interface "controlling"
the system, is the way I approach problems (And is I think the future as
most systems seems to be 10% core code, 90% interface code).
Another advantage is that a developer can opensource the controller code,
allowing the user to have a greater degree of flexibility.








More information about the Python-list mailing list