Tangential anti-educationist rant (was: what is easier to learn first?...)
Cameron Laird
claird at starbase.neosoft.com
Tue Mar 21 08:46:02 EST 2000
In article <XUDB4.2253$nI2.45719 at ptah.visi.com>,
Grant Edwards <nobody at nowhere.nohow> wrote:
.
.
.
>more Python. I'd definitely go with Python. C is for OS
>kernels, device drivers, and embedded work. It really oughtn't
>be taught to beginners or people who just want to write an
>application. C is low-level and unsafe: the programmer's got
>to do way too much of the housekeeping, and there are countless
>ways to hang yourself before you've even gotten enough rope out
>to accomplish anything. -- but at least the semantics are
>farily simple (assuming you know some assembly language and how
>compilers work).
.
.
.
It pretty well captures my impression of
institutional education that US high
schools commonly teach C (and C++!) as a
first programming language. I find that
typical of the mental abuse they thought-
lessly perpetrate.
--
Cameron Laird <claird at NeoSoft.com>
Business: http://www.Phaseit.net
Personal: http://starbase.neosoft.com/~claird/home.html
More information about the Python-list
mailing list