What If Python Replaced Elisp?

[Cameron Laird]

In article <xlxg0u0iy74.fsf at gold.cis.ohio-state.edu>,
Matt Curtin  <cmcurtin at interhack.net> wrote:
			.
			.
			.
>  Tad> Would it be easier to add a COM (automation) interface to
>  Tad> XEmacs if Python were used instead of Elisp?
>
>I do not see why.
			.
			.
			.
Because Mark Hammond has already worked miracles
in educating Python about COM.

Your general principle that elisp is already
quite refined, and more capable and mature than
naive observers realize, is unarguable.
-- 

Cameron Laird <claird at NeoSoft.com>
Business:  http://www.Phaseit.net
Personal:  http://starbase.neosoft.com/~claird/home.html